This via a Reuters piece.
US-Iran talks end without deal but leave door open for further dialogue.
Summary:
- US-Iran talks end without agreement
- Sides reportedly “close” before breakdown
- Key disputes: nuclear programme, Hormuz, sanctions
- Talks described as tense but ongoing
- Dialogue continues via intermediaries
- De-escalation incentives remain for both sides
Earlier:
High-level talks between the United States and Iran in Islamabad ended without a breakthrough, but both sides left the door open for continued dialogue, according to multiple sources familiar with the negotiations.
The weekend meeting, brokered by Pakistan and marking the first direct engagement at this level in decades, ran for more than 20 hours and at times appeared close to producing a framework agreement. Several sources indicated the sides were “very close” before key sticking points derailed progress late in the discussions.
Central disagreements remain entrenched around Iran’s nuclear programme, control of the Strait of Hormuz, and access to frozen assets. The United States is seeking a comprehensive agreement that would eliminate Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons, require the transfer of highly enriched uranium, and ensure the full reopening of Hormuz without restrictions. Iran, by contrast, is pushing for sanctions relief, guarantees against future military action, and continued control over its nuclear activities and strategic waterways.
The tone of the talks was described as tense and at times confrontational, with participants moving between separate rooms and Pakistani mediators working through the night to keep negotiations on track. While there were moments where the atmosphere improved and even raised the possibility of extending discussions, fundamental differences ultimately proved too significant to bridge.
Despite the lack of a deal, engagement between the two sides has continued following the talks, with intermediaries still relaying messages. Both sides appear to have incentives to pursue de-escalation, given the economic and political costs of the conflict.
Overall, while the immediate outcome fell short of expectations, the continuation of dialogue suggests diplomacy remains a live pathway.
This article was written by Eamonn Sheridan at investinglive.com.
